MA Curating Collections and Heritage student Feyza Nur Bacak discusses lessons learned in the storeroom while on placement at Brighton & Hove Museums
When the peacock-blue velvet dress was first unwrapped in the Brighton & Hove Museums store, it looked luminous and robust from a distance. Close up, it told a more delicate story. Velvet pile, chiffon ruffles, sequin embellishment, and a cotton lace under-ruffle each asked to be handled differently. This dress became my best teacher during the placement, showing me that conservation is as much about listening, testing and documenting as it is about cleaning.

Peacock-blue velvet dress laid out for assessment, chiffon ruffles and cotton lace visible. Full-length blue velvet dress with chiffon ruffles and lace under-ruffle on a worktable. © Feyza Nur Bacak, 27.06.2025, Brighton & Hove Museums.
Why this dress is complex
Each material carries its own risks. Velvet crushes easily, touch can leave imprints if we work against the pile or linger too long in one spot. Chiffon ruffles are open-weave and locally abraded; fibres can snag with minimal pressure. Sequins and stitching are brittle in places, so vigorous brushing could dislodge them. The cotton lace traps dust deep in its structure, but wet methods risk dye run from the deep blue velvet. In short: one garment, many voices, and we needed to hear them in sequence, not all at once.
Stabilise first, then test
Before any interventive step, we set the dress on a covered workstation and prioritised preventive care. Guided by my supervisor, I prepared micro test areas to calibrate tools and handling. We used a low-suction vacuum with a mesh interface to diffuse airflow and avoid direct contact and tried graded brushes to find the gentlest tool that still lifted dust.

Open-weave chiffon over cotton lace; mould accumulation along edges prior to micro-tests. © Feyza Nur Bacak, 27.06.2025, Brighton & Hove Museums.
On the chiffon ruffles, the softest brush removed loose dust but struggled with consolidated deposits along edges. A slightly firmer, small-head brush, used at a shallow angle with minimal pressure, was more effective there. On velvet, the safest action was controlled vacuuming through mesh, always following the pile direction and never dwelling. These are small moves, but they are exactly where risk is managed.
Documentation that drives decisions
What surprised me most was how strongly documentation shaped our choices. Using the museum’s system aligned to Spectrum, the UK’s collections management documentation standard, we recorded tools, settings, test locations and outcomes. Those entries produced comparable records: it was easy to see that “Brush B + mesh-vacuum” on the inner ruffle achieved cleaning with no fibre lift, whereas “Brush A” risked snagging at gathers.
The records didn’t just log what we did; they justified why we selected the gentlest effective method. They also make the work traceable and repeatable for colleagues and keep mounting/display options open, because decision history is transparent. In practice, documentation turns the ethical principle of “do no harm” into day-to-day, auditable actions.

Sequin embellishment alongside fragile chiffon at the sleeve and neckline. © Feyza Nur Bacak, 27.06.2025, Brighton & Hove Museums.
Handling and movement
Moving the dress required as much planning as cleaning it. Velvet’s pile can crush under its own weight, so we supported folds with acid-free tissue and avoided sliding. Around sequins we reduced contact to the minimum and kept the vacuum nozzle further away, letting the mesh diffuse suction. These adjustments sound small, but they spell the difference between an object that merely looks clean and one that remains stable enough to interpret and display.
What I learned
This case reframed conservation for me. It is not about making something look new; it is about risk management and evidence-based judgement. The most effective work often happens before anyone notices, stabilising, testing, adjusting, and recording. I also saw how conservation operates across departments: with Collections for storage and condition checks, Exhibitions for display preparation and movement, and Events for object safety. With limited staff and time, prioritisation and minimal intervention are not just ideals, they are practical necessities.
Why this matters for dress
Garments are embodied and social artefacts. Preserving them protects material and meaning together. Choosing a gentle method for the chiffon ruffles wasn’t only about fibres; it safeguarded the dress’s visual language, its lightness, movement and decorative intent, so future audiences can still read it.
This peacock-blue dress made me want to stay in conservation, especially textiles. It taught me that patience, micro-tests and good records aren’t the slow part of the job; they are the job, and how fragile objects get a second chance in the gallery.

Sequin embellishment adjacent to fragile chiffon; cleaned using mesh-interface low-suction vacuum and a soft brush. © Feyza Nur Bacak, 27.06.205, Brighton & Hove Museums.