Teaching observation #2

For my second observed teaching practice, I had a new class of students for EAP. The students took their four language exams in early January and those that failed to pass all the skills were reassigned classes for the rest of term before a second exam sitting in April.

The two-hour class was focused on preparation for essay writing in the first observed hour with the second hour spent writing the essay.

I decided to use the exact essay topic of their recent writing exam as an example. The topic was on the subject of whether we should eat less meat to help health, animal welfare and the environment. I thought this example was particularly relevant to teach and review some key essay writing techniques – in particular supporting details, counter arguments and refutations.  These are often areas in which students are weak and particularly Arabic students. This links in to my recent essay for the methodology module in which I focused on Arabic students’ difficulties in writing for EAP classes. As a culture that eats a relatively large amount of meat, this topic may be especially difficult for the students to see other points of view.

I did quite a lot of eliciting of ideas on the topic and then put students in discussion groups to brainstorm support and arguments before presenting key information on the areas on the board as well as examples of paragraphs. I supplemented this with a handout on paragraph structure and key language for counter arguments and refutations. I tried to keep the pace of the class quite steady. Overall I feel it was a successful class with consolidation of several key areas of weakness.

However, there are still some areas to work on. As they are a new class, it is quite hard work to get them talking and working with each other. I noticed immediately that there were half a dozen students who were engaged and eager to contribute while the rest of the class of 15 were less engaged (or at least quiet). This is the first area that I feel I could improve on. I already use techniques of calling upon students by name to answer questions rather than deferring to those who put their hands up but I feel engagement could have been better.

Secondly, there were issues of classroom management that I find difficult to deal with effectively. Firstly, students are all Arabic and too often revert to L1 when in group discussions. I regularly point this out but am sometimes at a loss at how to address continual use of L1 after warnings have already been given. Another classroom management point is students’ use of the bathroom. I have noticed that students often tend to ask to go to the toilet during the class and frequently come back after more time than would be considered normal – they are probably wasting time outside, on their phones etc. It’s a challenging issue that often interferes with the classroom dynamic and one I have discussed in my Critical Incidents section.

Lastly, I am mindful of teaching too closely to the test in this class. I prepared them to write a 300-word five-paragraph format essay in controlled conditions. It could be argued that it is of limited use for university study. I was mindful of this but it does seem necessary with many of these students to reinforce basics such as paragraph structure and quality of supporting detail. In particular, it’s important to reinforce that they need to consider opposing points of view in counter arguments as this will prepare them well for university education.

However, too often I feel I am teaching essay writing at equivalent high school level and it is a challenge to give them more useful research skills that equip them better for their degrees. It’s important to note that students also do a dedicated study skills module where they are required to research and reference, but in that module, many struggle to do this well, so it’s clearly an area in which they need all the practice they can get.

Further reflections following feedback

We had a very productive meeting to chat through our reflections on the lesson. My tutor gave me some interesting suggestions on how to improve classroom management.

We discussed having a class contract or at least setting some very clear ground rules to cut down on L1 use and students leaving the class. I have previously used the technique of asking students to leave their phones in the room if they leave and I intend to use this again, as it is quite effective.

We also discussed techniques for getting the students moving around the classroom, interacting with topics, using post-it notes. This is something I have done in the past but not recently with writing preparation and I think it could work well, so I will reflect on that.

We also discussed using not only model paragraphs but examples of poor and mediocre paragraphs for students to identify common errors. This would definitely be useful in future.

A key conclusion of the class was that, even though it was quite successful, a key issue was that I was working very hard, while many students were not engaged. My challenge is to create activities that prompt them to work and learn as they are doing so. Of course, it’s necessary for me to present and teach key points at times, but I need to improve at balancing this Teacher Talking Time with the entire group of students being actively involved rather than a select few.

Lesson plan, presentation and handout from the class can be found on the following link:

https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aisjk8RnnzgChWS7E9ZMmW8dPQ4q?e=UJ4zjd

Critical incident #4: Bathroom breaks and attendance

One of the joys of teaching at university compared with teaching younger people in schools is that by and large discipline is less of an issue. While I hear that secondary school teachers spend much of their time controlling the class and using disciplinary techniques, at university level the students tend to behave quite well and I can focus on teaching and learning.

However, this is not always the case and I noticed in class this week that requests for toilet breaks often caused problems. In a double class of 1 hour 45 minutes it’s not unreasonable that some students may need to go to the bathroom. However, it can be quite disruptive in classes where group or paired work is used regularly and tasks flow into each other so even missing five minutes is problematic.

In my class this week, a total of five students requested toilet breaks and at one point three members of a table of four were outside the class. These students (all male) were outside for around 15 minutes, apparently also buying water.

It was my first lesson with this class and I decided something needed to be said to try to nip this in the bud. It’s a difficult subject to address. I have never refused a student request to go to the toilet but when so many students leave and stay outside for a length of time, they are clearly taking advantage.

I impressed upon them the need to get refreshment before class, to bring water to class, and also to use the toilet before the class. They were all Arabic students and generally responded quite compliantly. However, some immediately requested a break in the middle of the class. I had incorporated a ten-minute break into double periods the previous year and found that students invariably took a longer break and it would often lead to 20 minutes being either missed or disrupted.

I wouldn’t expect toilet breaks to be a problem at university level but when you consider that most of the students are aged around 18, have never been away from home before, and are studying in an environment which is largely more lenient than the strict protocols they were used to in high school, then it’s not very surprising. I have decided to continue to address the issue in future classes by impressing the need to get refreshment and take bathroom breaks before class, but whether this is successful remains to be seen.

The issue is a symptom of a wider problem of attendance. The college has recently changed its attendance policy quite drastically. Last year, no student should have been admitted more than 15 minutes after the beginning of the class. This rule was quite strictly enforced and resulted in many students being turned away and marked absent if they arrived after 15 minutes. Additionally, it led to students deciding not to come to class at all if they felt they were going to be late. They would be marked absent for both periods in a double class too.

It was decided at a higher level that, mainly due to compliance reasons, the policy had to be changed so that if there was any contact at all with the student, they would be marked as ‘late but present’. Now it is possible for students to arrive at any point in a double class and be marked ‘late but present’ – even arriving 5 minutes before the end. This has created its own problems with students far more frequently arriving half an hour late to class, aware that they would receive a late rather than an absence as would previously have been the case.

We discussed as a department the negative repercussions of this and it was decided that teachers could use, if they felt it was needed, a form for the student to fill in to explain persistent lateness and, if it persisted further, to refer the student for a meeting with the head of department. We have yet to see if this policy will yield results but we hope that the demonstration of tangible consequences to lateness will have a positive effect on attendance.

Even in ESL at university level, awareness of disciplinary methods and procedures is very important to the smooth running of the class. In my experience, if students are given too much slack they will take advantage so firm rules and consequences are important to enforce to keep the classes running as well as possible.