Social Media Influencers. Do they promote or destroy brands?

In the modern constantly changing environment, competition among brands is growing and thus companies are trying to adapt by employing new promotion methods. 

One of the most trending, quick and effective approach to reaching a wide audience is collaborating with influencers. The idea behind this promotion method is that by communicating a message to a handful of influencers companies get access to their immense networks (Fastenau, 2018). 

Framework of Reaching a Wide Audience by Collaborating with Influencers (Fastenau, 2018)

Understandably, brands are taking various actions to be associated with popular social media personas including sending out free products, paying for promotion and building long term relationship by introducing brand ambassador programmes. However, the key to success of this actions is choosing the influencers. Therefore, it is highly important to have a deep understanding of this phenomenon.

According to academic researchers (Freberg et al., 2011) social media influencers (SMI) represent a new type of independent third-party endorser who shape audience attitudes through blogs, tweets, and the use of other social media. Although forging alliances with influencers became a common practice, some scholars appear to view them as competing and possibly hostile voices (Gorry, Westbrook, 2009).

Freberg et al. (2011) introduce a term “SMI capital” which refers to the contribution of SMI to an organisation’s bottom line. In order to maximise this capital, a company requires methods that provide precise information about relevant influencers and how they are perceived by audiences. According to the study, SMI are perceived as smart, ambitious, productive, poised, power-oriented, candid and dependable as well as likely to be sought out for advice and reassurance and more likely to give advice.

Self-branding plays an essential role in a process of influencer’s establishing. Personal or self-branding involves individuals developing a distinctive public image for commercial gain and/or cultural capital (Khamis et al., 2017). The number of books, websites, workshops, presentations, videos and articles devoted to its principles and promotion is evidence of its prevalence and appeal (find links to some guides below). According to the analysis of Khamis et al. (2017), the rise of social media and our current consumerist orientation may have contributed to popularity personal branding. 

Khamis et al. (2017) suggest that three distinct and interrelated processes are critical for this phenomenon:

  • transformative and seminal effects of social, interactive and conversational media in the Information Age; 
  • mercurial dismantling of what were once ‘knowledge monopolies’, as quasi-experts appropriate the role historically reserved for highly trained specialists;
  • near-total extension of marketing logic and language into more areas of contemporary social life. 

While all these processes predate and are not exclusive to social media, cumulatively social media intensifies and spotlights their salience.

Nevertheless, technology never bestows only benefits. While the Internet and social media have brought businesses undeniable opportunities for growth, they have also created means for potential significant damage of business reputation and customer perception of brands (Gorry, Westbrook, 2009). 

Customer reports of unfavourable experiences, especially if the customer has a wide audience can have a substantial economic impact on a company, and sometimes even cause erosion of brand equity and corporate reputation. Although the Internet has deprived companies of the control they once had over their reputations, it offers them new ways to interact with their customers to tell the story of ‘who we are’. Such collaboration can be an important anchor in the constantly changing Internet environment. And, in the long run, it can help companies strengthen the loyalty of their customers and enhance their market performance (Gorry, Westbrook, 2009).

Gorry and Westbrook (2009) suggest several steps to promote genuine conversations with customers:

Step 1: Listen to Your Customers: monitoring customer opinions;

Step 2: Trust Your Employees: empowering employees to represent the company;

Step 3: Learn to Use the Tools: being present on various platforms, leading the discussion, collaborating with representatives such as opinion leaders or influencers;

Step 4: Let the Conversations be Authentic: letting the conversation develop spontaneously and natural.

Here are some ideas on how to engage customers online:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/miketempleman/2017/08/20/7-ways-to-make-meaningful-connections-with-your-customers-on-social-media/#3699f95e7b66

https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescommunicationscouncil/2017/08/30/12-ways-to-communicate-your-brand-to-customers-for-increased-recognition/#4b694e931b5f

https://articles.bplans.com/seven-creative-ways-to-engage-with-your-customers-online/

https://www.business2community.com/customer-experience/best-practices-communicating-customers-online-01248106

To conclude, social media influencers are both third independent party and intermediary between brands and wide audience. They can promote brands or products on the one hand, but not the other hand, their negative opinions can damage brand reputation. Therefore, it is critical to build healthy relationship with the influencers who are relevant for the target market segment of a company.

Guides on self-branding:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2017/12/21/building-a-personal-brand-16-simple-tips-for-todays-executives/#59cc4ac2727b

https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/298513

https://brandyourself.com/definitive-guide-to-personal-branding

https://www.shopify.com/blog/116266245-personal-branding-how-to-market-yourself-without-selling-out

References:

Fastenau, J. (2018) ‘Under the Influence: The Power of Social Media Influencers’. Crobox [Online] Available at <https://medium.com/crobox/under-the-influence-the-power-of-social-media-influencers-5192571083c3> [Accessed 11/05/2018] 

Freberg, L.A., Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K. (2011) ‘Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality’. Public Relations Review, Vol 37, no. 1, pp.90-92.

Gorry, G.A., Westbrook, R.A. (2009) ‘Winning the Internet Confidence Game’. Corporate Reputation Review, Vol 12, no. 3, pp.195-203.

Khamis, S., Ang, L., Welling, R. (2017) ‘Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of Social Media Influencers’. Celebrity Studies, Vol 8, no. 2, pp.191-18.

What Makes People Share Content in Social Media and how Businesses could Capitalise it?


Social media has become an indispensable part of day-to-day life for almost every person and an important marketing tool for most of the companies. One of the effective ways to reach a wider audience on social media is to benefit from other users sharing your content. Thus, there is a great number of articles on Internet advising on not only how to create the content people would love to share, but also what, when and how often one should or should not share.

The dimensions of the posts which are likely to be shared have been studied in academia as well. The researchers highlight such characteristics as emotional component (Heath et al., 2001) and relation to environmental cues (Berger, Schwartz,  2011) as well as popularity or being consistent with the image the target audience is developing (Toubia, Stephen, 2013). Additionally, social contagion and influence can significantly affect the diffusion process (Van den Bulte, Joshi, 2007). However, most papers focus on one dimension only and do not take into account how it is connected to the others.

By contrast, Zhang et al. (2017) introduce a model of social media rebroadcasting behaviour that integrates the various factors shown to influence the likelihood of sharing some content. Their research provides evidence that the fit between the message content and the audience’s interest is a significant driver of rebroadcasting behaviour and proves that shares by influentials affect the behaviour of other users who are susceptible to influence. However, there is considerable variation across users both in terms of their ability to influence other users and their susceptibility to the influence of others’ rebroadcasting. 

Importantly for SMM specialists, the tailored messages designed to match the preferences and interests of the audience were found out to be most effective when there is less heterogeneity in the audience’s interests. Modelling content-user fit is crucial for user’s rebroadcasting decisions and consequently in a firm’s social media marketing strategies (Zhang et al.,2017). 

Overall, the results of the study suggest that targeting influentials to encourage their rebroadcasting of our message can potentially lead to greater rebroadcasting activity than investing in message content. However, the analysis also provides evidence that, under certain circumstances, tailoring message content to the interests of the influentials can generate even greater rebroadcasting activity. Also, concerning the impact of content-user fit in social media rebroadcasting, while academical literature has suggested that certain types of content are on average more viral, it may be critical for managers to ensure that this content fits the preferences of their audience base. Content-user fit can possibly be especially impactful for homogenous followers, for which managers could tailor content to the followers’ preferences rather than simply disseminate viral content. 

To conclude, although brands spend significant resources on social media to connect with their customers, there is limited understanding on how consumers engage with brands on social media and how it influences their purchase process. Therefore a further research may also look at influence in terms of one’s impact on brand health measures, the purchasing behaviour of others or context-specific decisions. Nowadays, practitioners are transforming the way to communicate with their target audiences and social media as new marketing channel allow them to engage with influencers one on one. A strategy is critical to the success of almost immediate continuing consumer conversations about the brands. With the immense growth of bloggers and their increasing power as influencers for media and consumers, analysing and evaluating the most influential for the targeted audience is a vital part of any social media campaign. Identifying the tiers of influencers and how they fit into a brand’s social media strategy will ensure a social media engagement that produces measurable results and a positive contribution to brand equity (Booth et al., 2011) 

 

References:

Berger, J., Schwartz, E.M. (2011) ‘What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth?’, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol 48, Issue 5, pp.869-880.

Booth, N., Matic, J.A. (2011) ‘Mapping and leveraging influencers in social media to shape corporate brand perceptions’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol 16 Issue 3, pp.184-191.

Heath, C., Bell, C., Sternberg, E. (2001) ‘Emotional selection in memes: the case of urban legends’, Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol 81, Issue 6, pp.1028-1041.

Toubia, O., Stephen, A.T. (2013) ‘Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to twitter?’, Marketing Science, Vol 32, Issue 3, pp.368-392.

Van den Bulte, C., Joshi, Y.V. (2007) ‘New product diffusion with influentials and imitators’,  Marketing Science, Vol 26, Issue 3, pp.400-421.

Zhang, Y., Moe, W.W., Schweidel, D.A. (2017) ‘Modeling the role of message content and influencers in social media rebroadcasting’, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol 34, Issue 1, pp.100-119.