Word of mouth is an incredibly influential force for online marketing campaigns to harness. Research has shown consumers and business service-users generally trust peer-reviews more than advertisers or marketers, and in some cases from communities around EWOM communication (Cheung et al., 2008).
However, how far should marketers go towards ‘harnessing’ what Blackshaw (2006) calls “CGM” (consumer-generated marketing)? In his capacity as Chief Marketing Officer of Neilsen Buzzmetrics – the US advertising analytics agency – he suggests that CGM is a gift to marketers. CGM/EWOM provides consumers with trust, credibility, restraint and balance, which they no longer expect through traditional marketing channels.
The influence of reviews and online recommendations is precisely why overt discussions about “harnessing” CGM are, Blackshaw suggests, dangerous. Shill reviews, undeclared blog sponsorship, branded social media accounts – all act to make consumers doubt all forms of online conversation, which can only be detrimental to marketing efforts.
In the long-term, is it more important to listen to real and authentic views of our customers, to act on the insight and become better at what we do, or should we continue to try to ‘own’ our online chatter, and risk losing trust for good?
Blackshaw, P. (2006) ‘Commentary: consumer-generated media is fragile – don’t mess it up’, Advertising Age, [Online] Available at: <http://adage.com/article/digital/commentary-consumer-generated-media-fragile-mess/111679/> [Accessed 8th March, 2015]
Cheung, C., Matthew, L. and Rabjohn, N., (2008) ‘The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities’, Internet Research, Vol. 18 (Iss: 3) pp. 229-247