Is Ad-blocking killing the free web?

Ad block 1

AdBlock Plus is the most popular ad blocker on the web. This browser plugin has been downloaded and installed millions of times, and is available for a range of different browsers. Although AdBlock Plus is the most popular ad blocker, dozens of alternatives are available.
Why Ad-blocking is so controversial is because a vast majority of websites exist thanks to online advertising.
Millions of websites, from tiny blogs to huge corporate-owned magazines, depend on online advertising revenues in order to operate (Shewan, 2015).

 A recent study from the Reuters Institute for The Study of Journalism, suggested that only 13% of the internet users in the US, find traditional banner advertising useful, and near half find it distracting to their experience. 29% already say they avoid certain sites because of it. Furthermore, there is strong reason to believe that those attitudes are leading to faster uptake of ad avoidance techniques, in particular among millennials. 57% of those aged 18 to 29 say they would consider using ad blocking software if the number of ads they were served continued to increase (Mascioli, 2015).

ad-blockers-two

Quality online content comes with a cost. Authors, journalists, researchers, bloggers dedicate time and intellectual effort to provide you with news, insightful ideas and knowledge. The content which you can easily access online, costs the publisher money.

When you turn on ad blocking you minimize the content publisher’s revenue.
While ad blocking does have an indirect effect on publishers earning through cost per click based ads, many large publishers use ad-impressions (CPM) to earn from advertising.
Each time an ad is displayed it is counted as an ad-impression, irrespective of whether the user clicks on it. These ad-impressions turns in to money which is used by the content publisher to pay authors, journalists, researchers, staff and finally itself if presumably they have any profits left (Oberoi, 2015).

So why should you not be using ad blockers?
Well, first of all, it means that the authors and staff etc. does not get any money.
With less ad revenue, big and smaller content providers are financially damaged. The New York Times, Boston Globe and The Times use different paid digital content models in an effort to improve revenue and counteract losses, which ad blocking causes.
If websites and newspapers offer their content through subscriptions, the whole idea of ‘free access to information’ is gone.

The Internet is not going to be a fee-based service any time soon, but we’ll surely see publications getting more aggressive in their attempts to counteract their ad revenue losses. If online advertising no longer serves them, other money-making models will be discovered.

Ad blocking is urging publications and media giants to experiment with different revenue models as they realize online advertising is no longer a viable option. mainly due to the proliferation and enhancement of ad blocking technologies.
Using pay walls is not exactly a million-dollar idea, in fact many times it have had the opposite effect, with subscriptions being very poor and online visitors heading to alternative free newspapers for their daily news fix (Naughton, 2015).

Ad block 3

Even though a lot of people see ad blocking as harmless, it does harm a lot of businesses.
For a commercially sustainable Internet, advertising is essential.
Publishers will adopt new models for revenue, which will most likely mean less and low-quality content will be available for free.
The rest will be on a pay-for basis.

Ad blocking is a wake-up call for advertising agencies and the media who use them, it’s telling them that consumers are becoming more discerning and demanding, but this could backfire as big news media and publications adopt more invasive advertising approaches including sponsored articles, back-links and so on.

In the end, it is not about feeling guilty for ad-blocking your favorite website, it is about realizing how your actions are to your disadvantage in the long-run.

References

Mascioli, G. (2015). Will Ad-Blocking Millennials Destroy Online Publishing Or Save It?. Available: http://www.forbes.com/sites/giannimascioli/2015/09/20/will-ad-blocking-millennials-destroy-online-publishing-or-save-it/#66ca29616a6b. Last accessed 25th April 2016.

Naughton, J. (2015). The rise of ad-blocking could herald the end of the free internet. Available: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/27/ad-blocking-herald-end-of-free-internet-ios9-apple. Last accessed 25th April 2016

Oberoi, A. (2015). 5 Reasons How Ad Blocking is Killing Information On The Internet. Available: http://www.adpushup.com/blog/ad-blocking-bad-news-consumers/. Last accessed 25th April 2016.

 Shewan, D. (2015). The Rise of Ad Blockers: Should Advertisers Be Panicking?(!!). Available: http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2015/10/02/ad-blockers. Last accessed 25th April 2016.

 

Advertising on Facebook, good or bad?

facebook-advertising

Individuals act in such manner that would maximize their benefits gained from social interactions (James T. Tedeschi, 2009).
Facebook provides an easy to use platform that can be accessed from almost anywhere to fulfill social needs of people. However, it can also be used for companies to advertise their products and keeping in touch with their customers.
Facebook alone has over 955 million active users and over 50% of active users log on to Facebook every day and an average user has approximately 130 friends on Facebook (Melason, 2012).

Thanks to the vast base of users Facebook is having, it becomes a paradise for marketers. It enables marketers to customize their advertisements to fit certain group of individuals. This can be done according to their demographic features or by their interests, and all marketers have to do is to choose which factors they are going to target their advertisements towards.

facebook-advertising-ss-1920
There are two different ways of advertising of behavioral targeting; Network targeting and On-site Targeting. In network targeting, the data is collected from various different sites and user preferences, where as on-site targeting is based on a specific-site. Facebook used to have on-site targeting, but is nowadays following its users’ moves even outside Facebook. There are two sides to this; Facebook follows users through their cookies as well as their “likes” (Popkin, 2011).

Difference Between Facebook ads and Google ads

google-vs-facebook

Before we look at the various strengths of Google AdWords and Facebook Ads, it’s crucial to understand the primary difference between the two platforms.
Facebook Ads is a prime example of what is known as “paid social,” or the practice of advertising on social networks. With the highest number of MAUs of any social network in the world.
Unlike paid search, paid social helps users to find businesses based on the things they’re interested in and the ways in which they behave online.

Google AdWords is the world’s largest and most popular PPC advertising platform. AdWords is so widely used, it has become synonymous with the term “paid search.”
Paid search focuses on the targeting of keywords and the use of text-based advertisements. Advertisers using AdWords bid on keywords in the hopes that their ads will be displayed alongside search results.

Strengths of Google and Facebook
Today, Facebook Ads is a pioneer in the sphere of paid social, and has become a central part of many business’ digital marketing strategies.
Marketers are often taken by surprise by the potential return on investment that Facebook advertising offers, and how far advertisers can stretch a limited budget on the platform.
This highly competitive pricing makes Facebook a very attractive proposition to small businesses and companies with limited resources. Combined with the remarkable potential returns offered by the platform, Facebook is one of the best online advertising solutions available today (Wordstream, 2016).
Google AdWords vs Facebook Ads Facebook ad budget example

Google’s advertising offerings are split across two primary networks – the Search network, and the Display network.
The Search network is the entirety of Google as a search engine, and advertisers can bid on an almost unlimited supply of keywords and phrases to target prospective customers.
The Google Display Network, which offers advertisers more visual ads such as banners, spans approximately 98% of the World Wide Web, making it a great choice for advertisers who want to accomplish marketing goals such as raising brand awareness.
Google makes an excellent addition to a digital marketing strategy, when combined with Google’s increasingly accurate search results, it’s easy to see why AdWords is the most popular and widely used PPC platform in the world (Wordstream, 2016).
Google AdWords vs Facebook Ads Quality Score diagram

Risks of Using Facebook for Advertisement
Before anyone should use Facebook for advertising, there are some risks to consider.
For example, if you’re caught using false information about a product, you might expect some negative feedback. When dealing with social media, this can go viral and spiral out of control. Dishonesty can be a trending topic on a variety of social sites, not just Facebook.
Using an online service is a constant risk for hackers, they are everywhere and in large numbers.
People can get classified information, so be aware of displaying emails, keeping the same password, etc.
The more risks that companies are aware of in social media, the better equipped they will be at handling them. The risks mentioned above only cover a small number of the many potential issues that could be faced (Robinson, 2013).
facebook AD

Conclusion
Using Facebook as a platform for advertisement is a great idea for either new companies or massive producers thanks to the low costs. There is no competition or bidding for keywords when using Facebook like there is for Google. However, there are major risks of using Facebook for ads thanks to the sheer exposure that occurs.
Facebook is the largest social media platform out there with nearly 1 billion users, not to use the advertising opportunity would be foolish in many peoples mind (Kapp, et.al. 2013).

References
Kapp, J, Peters, C & Oliver, D. (2013). Research Recruitment Using Facebook Advertising: Big Potential, Big Challenges. Journal of Cancer Education. 28 (1), p134-137.

Lukka, V & James, P. (2014). Attitudes toward Facebook advertising.Journal of Management and Marketing Research. 14 (2), p1-26.

Melason, D. (2012). Facebook posts first earnings as a public company Retrieved 12.9.2012, [http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/26/facebook-posts-first-earnings-as-a-publiccompany-1-8-billion/]

Popkin, (2011). Facebook to stop following you after log off. Retrieved from [http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/09/27/7991573-facebook-to-stopfollowing-you-after-log-off

Robinson, C. (2016). The Risks Associated with Social Media Marketing.Available: http://blog.tailwindapp.com/risks-of-social-media-marketing/. Last accessed 18th April 2016.

Tedeschi T.J (2009). Conflict, Power & Games – The Experimental Study of Interpersonal Relations: Transaction Publishers]

Wordstream. (2016). Facebook Ads vs. Google AdWords: Which Should You Be Using?. Available: http://www.wordstream.com/facebook-vs-google. Last accessed 18th April 2016