Day 5 – Presentation and Conclusion

On this day we finished the poster with input from the 6th formers who created the titles for us. We then presented our designs to the rest of the class.

The presentation on a whole went relatively well. We were all well spoken and clearly presented our ideas. We were were told that our ideas were very good, but the final presentation of our designs needed more “finesse” as some aspects were very rough and not refined enough, which I completely agree with.

Overall i believe we created a very good design that covered all aspects of the brief very well, but our final product was undersold. to avoid this from happening next time and to ensure we put our ideas across in a clearer manner, I believe better time management is needed as well as better delegation of the work. This would of ensured that the poster and models were to the same quality as our final idea.

In conclusion I throughly enjoyed the week. Although it was very hard work and we were in uni for 8/9 hours a day, I think that the week was very rewarding and I learnt a great deal about the make up of bridges, and how good time management and delegation of work is vital to keep a project like this running smoothly.

Although I enjoyed it, i do not believe that the involvement of the 6th formers was needed as they only contributed partially to the work. Although again this can be argued against as with better delegation of work they could have been involved more.

Attached is a picture of our final presentation.

20161113-114132.jpg

Day 4- finishing bridge and detail

Today I continued by researching different components for the detail. I came across this source which we could use for our detail.

http://www.graitec.com/en/FAQ_view.asp?FAQID=983#placa_baza_taiata

As a group we agreed that we were going to detail the column to foundation detail and after sketching out my ideas I started on the model.

First i acquired a tube that fits to our scale. Then i cut out the holding steel member and made the foundation hooks out of wire. Then I acquired a foam block for use as the foundation. This was then all put together to create the detail shown in the attached images.

While I was doing this the group continued by finishing our map, cutting out blocks for the proposal of the new buildings outside of Mithras and Preston barracks so we could get a feel for the space we had and the fixed our bridge in place.

We finished the day by gathering information and drawings for the poster which we then put together as a group.

20161113-112607.jpg

20161113-112621.jpg

20161113-112635.jpg

20161113-112705.jpg

Day 3 – model making

On day three we came together with the Hazlewick students and incorporated their ideas into our design. This included the cable and column structure which we envisioned on the previous day. After consolation and some design development we went to the modelling studio to start on the model.

Firstly we delegated the job of creating the ramp shafts to the 6th formers as we needed three to show the space for the ramps. We then continued by drawing our bridge on the map to give us a feel for dimensions and required distances, I then traced round this on trancing paper and transferred it to foamboard. This was then cut out and put into place.

I then continued by cutting out the parapets out of card. This card was to the required thickness of the handrail to scale. This job was then passed on to Rowan so I could research different components for the detail.

Day 2 – Design Development

On this day we researched more bridge designs and came up with a rough design for our bridge which was an L shape cable suspension bridge which spanned from Lewes Road across to the barracks, with a ramp leading to Cockcroft. We established that this was a good idea but was a bit excessive, so we decided to refine it.

We also researched different specifications our bridge would need to be, for example i established that it needed to be 5.1m above the road, so as a group we decided to give the bridge a height of 6m.

I also established that the width needed to be a minimum of 5 meters to incorporate pedestrians and cyclists going both ways. (2 meters for pedestrians, 3 meters for cyclists. So we incorporated this into our design as well.

We then printed out a digimap of the site so we could build our bridge on this. We had a few problems with the scaling of the map, but after some determination and trial and error we found the right scale, printed out the map and stuck it to our base board.

The final outcome of the day was deciding on the supporting structure for the bridge. We decided on a column structure with a support for the ramps.

20161113-110924.jpg

Summary (the good, the bad and the ugly)

In conclusion to the week, I think my team did a good job but time management was our biggest issue. A way we could’ve have done better is by creating a plan within the group on the first day that way, we could have been more organised with individual and group tasks. That way everyone would know what to do each day and if individual tasks were set out to meet everyone’s strength, I believe we could have done a better job as everyone would have been bringing their own individual strength. 

But it was a great opportunity to work people you would not automatically put yourself in a group with; giving me some sort of world experience as, in the industry you are working in groups with all different types of personalities and being able to work efficiently within these groups is important. That is a positive I’m taking from this, that the week has helped me work within a group while voicing my opinion. 

The project also allowed me to spot my weaknesses and highlight my strengths which are; I need to further my drawing skills, and can leave the architect type of thinking of design and getting carried away with ideas and start to think of build-ability of the design I am coming up with, like looking at the materials and building regulations. One of my strengths has always been my leadership skills, which came in handy, when I was working with the college students as I worked closely with them throughout the week; when buying materials, making the model or just simply just showing them how to use the equipment. 

Even though the week was extremely stressful, I am glad I did it as it was my first time completing an AT project from start to finish and has definably solidified, that I am doing the right course. Moving forward I will be bring everything I’ve learnt from the week into my future projects. 

Humber Day 5(we did it, well sort of)

WE MADE IT

Friday that day we were all waiting for, the day our bridge’s fate would be sealed as we would have to present in front of the Poorang, Noel, the collage staff and Kristy.

img_2355

We all got started early to start putting the final touches on the poster and model. The presentation was meant to begin at 11am and we started at 9am so it would be a pretty tight run, but we did not anticipate how tight of a squeeze it would be.

Our leader had us create levels so that we could show how the bridge would be positioned by Mithras house, car park and road as they all have different levels. We started making the nets for which we would turn into cubes as this would be easier to glue and place onto out base saving time. Once this was done the columns were meant to be stuck onto the base of the bridge model but unfortunately there wasn’t any time to do so, so we had to just place the different parts in the position.

Lucky our poster was done on time and had everyone’s input placed on.

 

img_2342

The pictures below show the different parts of the poster.

img_2349

As you can see above that shows our finished idea showcasing the; tunnel, ramps and of course our WOW factor the donut.

img_2350 img_2352

And of course couldn’t finish without showing our sort of finished model.

img_2345img_2344

And like that it was time to do our presentation, this was nerve racking as we didn’t get proper briefing form the team leader of what we were going to say or the order. We just knew we had to talk, so we pretty much winged.  But our group is great at winging it, unfortunately as we didn’t complete the model our WOW bridge wasn’t quite wow.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Menai • Day #1 • Introduction

First day of the week we was given the brief of the assignment. The design week was combined with a sixth form college and there were assigned to be apart of this design week but they were only in 3 days of the week.
On the arrival of the college students they were assigned a group and in my team we had 3 university students including myself and 3 college students.

We had our first group meeting once we were allocated into groups; we introduced ourselves and went over the Brief to get an idea of what is asked from us.

After the break, we headed out to site to get an idea of what were working with and come with with different ideas on where we should locate our bridge.

20161113-090426.jpg

After the afternoon lecture, we had another group meeting just bouncing ideas of where it should be located and also ideas of any designs.

As group leader, I gave each team member tasks to do at home and to bring it in for the next day.

Tasks included –
~ precedent studies
~ initial ideas
~ reviewing digimap
~ gathering material

Humber Day 4(Opps, and trying to meet the deadline)

 

On day 4 we thought we were pretty set but little did we know, that wasn’t the case, as we went for a 1:200 scale we later found out this would be too small for making the detail, which needed to be done.

So, as you can imagine everyone was feeling stressed and pressed for time, so we had to start the modelling process again.

The new chosen scale was 1:100 as this would be bigger and would allow us to make a clear detailed drawing and model, showing what the bridge is made from.

 

img_2296

 

As you can see this is the final model that was created, to the right scale.

A 1:10 detail had to be made to show how the bridge would be made and held together; through research online we found a detail with all the components and from that I could start building a model.

Detail

As you can tell the bridge is made from, a 65x205mm clay paver, 20mm class 1 mortar, 60mm of dense basecourse bituminous macadam and 150mm compacted DTp1 Granular sub-base.

At the end of this day we were ready but still panicking as we had a model and poster to finish for Friday.

 

Part 3 – Design Considerations

The next step was to make note of all the parameters of our given site.

We firstly researched the required dimensions, starting with the width needed on the decking to accommodate all users. The Department for Transport suggest a minimum width of 3 metres for a two-way cycle path, and 2 metres for a pedestrian path with the view to accommodating wheelchair users, as laid out in Local Transport Note 1/12 (page 40).

Secondly, we looked at the height needed to successfully clear all vehicular traffic. The tallest vehicle which uses Lewes Road is the double-decker bus, which stands at approx. 4.3 metres tall. However, the Highways Agency requires a headroom of 5.7 metres for footbridges. Part 2.8 of Approved Document K states that ramps should have a maximum gradient of 1:12, meaning the subsequent ramp must be at least 68.4 metres.

192 Next, we had a look at external influences, the main one being the tree obstructions. In an attempt to find out if any of the trees in question were protected, we searched the Brighton & Hove Council website for Tree Preservation Orders. Unfortunately, the council charge over £30 to release the documents, so we were unable to acquire the necessary information.

A key consideration,as briefly mentioned on the opening day, is the redevelopment of Preston Barracks. As this is due to form an addition part of the University of Brighton’s Mouslecoomb campus, it is highly likely that the client is hoping to use the new footbridge to integrate this land with the existing university buildings. Our research (eventually) led us to the official website for the redevelopment, Momentum for Lewes Road (www.momentumlewesroad.com). Here we found the ‘Masterplan’, the proposed layout of the renovated area:

public-consultationThe new buildings situated in what is currently Mithras Car park meant that we were not able to stretch the bridge from the steps immediately outside of Mithras House, which would have cleared the road height by around 7 metres. Instead, we would have to use some land much nearer to, if not part of, the existing pathway. Another observation we made is that the renovators plan on removing some trees in order to install a footbridge of their own, which implies that we wouldn’t have a problem removing any obstructing trees for our bridge.

Resources:

DMRB Volume 6 Section 1 Part 2 – TD 27/05 – Cross Sections and Headrooms: http://www.standardsforhighways.co.uk/ha/standards/dmrb/vol6/section1/td2705.pdf

Momentum Lewes Road Masterplan: http://www.momentumlewesroad.com/plans/masterplan-2/

Tree Preservation Orders (Brighton and Hove City Council): http://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/content/leisure-and-libraries/parks-and-green-spaces/tree-preservation-orders

Building Regulations 2010: Approved Document K: Protection from falling, collision and impact

Part 2 – Case Studies

1. Ponte Segunda Circular

ponte-segunda

Location: Lisbon, Portugal

Designers: Maximina Almeida & Telmo Cruz

 

 

As referenced in the title, this steel structure crosses the Second Circular Road in Lisbon, and is accessible by cyclists and pedestrians. This bridge is held up by two columns either side of the road, and is therefore void of structural support on the road itself, which is beneficial as the road would not have had to be fully closed for construction, nor would it be for maintenance. There are 5 methods of access, 4 ramps and 1 set of stairs. Although the bridge has an inclusive design, it is unfortunate that it couldn’t be entirely step free. It is possible that the steps were installed by choice as there are enough wheelchair access routes, and a quicker route by foot was desired.

mxt-studio-lisbon-bridge-architonic06-pontesegundacircular-167-foto-joao-morgado-03esbocos-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

The parapets are below shoulder height, leaving cyclists somewhat vulnerable to falling over the side in the event of a collision.vista-1I am particularly drawn to this bridge due to its network of connections, which utilise the land footprint to provide multiple potential routes for users, depending on their destination. This consideration would be appropriate for the given brief as university students often have to travel between the buildings, and destinations can vary both student to student and day to day.

 

Jan Waaijer Bridge

sl_jan-waaijerbrug_foto2_xl

Location: Westerpark, Netherlands

Syb van Breda & Co. Architects

 

 

 

The primary element of this bridge which sticks out is the segregated, differentiated paving for cyclists and pedestrians. The different pavings provide subtle instruction for users, removing the need for aesthetically hindering barriers.

sl_jan-waaijerbrug_foto4_l

Like the previous, this bridge also accommodates the need to access more than two destinations, and allows users to psl_jan-waaijerbrug_schets1_meel off in their desired directions seamlessly.

The lampposts, which also act as structural members, have drawn their form from the surrounding forestry, an effective method of townscaping.

 

Melkwegbridge

dezeen_melkwegbridge-by-next-architects-and-rietveld-landscape_11

Location: Purmerend, Netherlands

NEXT Architects and Rietveld Landscape

 

 

 

This bridge offers an alternate solution to giving pedestrians and cyclists designated spaces; cyclists (and wheelchair users) are provided with a flat zig-zagged deck while pedestrians walk over a steep, arched upper level.