Summary (the good, the bad and the ugly)

In conclusion to the week, I think my team did a good job but time management was our biggest issue. A way we could’ve have done better is by creating a plan within the group on the first day that way, we could have been more organised with individual and group tasks. That way everyone would know what to do each day and if individual tasks were set out to meet everyone’s strength, I believe we could have done a better job as everyone would have been bringing their own individual strength. 

But it was a great opportunity to work people you would not automatically put yourself in a group with; giving me some sort of world experience as, in the industry you are working in groups with all different types of personalities and being able to work efficiently within these groups is important. That is a positive I’m taking from this, that the week has helped me work within a group while voicing my opinion. 

The project also allowed me to spot my weaknesses and highlight my strengths which are; I need to further my drawing skills, and can leave the architect type of thinking of design and getting carried away with ideas and start to think of build-ability of the design I am coming up with, like looking at the materials and building regulations. One of my strengths has always been my leadership skills, which came in handy, when I was working with the college students as I worked closely with them throughout the week; when buying materials, making the model or just simply just showing them how to use the equipment. 

Even though the week was extremely stressful, I am glad I did it as it was my first time completing an AT project from start to finish and has definably solidified, that I am doing the right course. Moving forward I will be bring everything I’ve learnt from the week into my future projects. 

Humber Day 5(we did it, well sort of)

WE MADE IT

Friday that day we were all waiting for, the day our bridge’s fate would be sealed as we would have to present in front of the Poorang, Noel, the collage staff and Kristy.

img_2355

We all got started early to start putting the final touches on the poster and model. The presentation was meant to begin at 11am and we started at 9am so it would be a pretty tight run, but we did not anticipate how tight of a squeeze it would be.

Our leader had us create levels so that we could show how the bridge would be positioned by Mithras house, car park and road as they all have different levels. We started making the nets for which we would turn into cubes as this would be easier to glue and place onto out base saving time. Once this was done the columns were meant to be stuck onto the base of the bridge model but unfortunately there wasn’t any time to do so, so we had to just place the different parts in the position.

Lucky our poster was done on time and had everyone’s input placed on.

 

img_2342

The pictures below show the different parts of the poster.

img_2349

As you can see above that shows our finished idea showcasing the; tunnel, ramps and of course our WOW factor the donut.

img_2350 img_2352

And of course couldn’t finish without showing our sort of finished model.

img_2345img_2344

And like that it was time to do our presentation, this was nerve racking as we didn’t get proper briefing form the team leader of what we were going to say or the order. We just knew we had to talk, so we pretty much winged.  But our group is great at winging it, unfortunately as we didn’t complete the model our WOW bridge wasn’t quite wow.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Humber Day 4(Opps, and trying to meet the deadline)

 

On day 4 we thought we were pretty set but little did we know, that wasn’t the case, as we went for a 1:200 scale we later found out this would be too small for making the detail, which needed to be done.

So, as you can imagine everyone was feeling stressed and pressed for time, so we had to start the modelling process again.

The new chosen scale was 1:100 as this would be bigger and would allow us to make a clear detailed drawing and model, showing what the bridge is made from.

 

img_2296

 

As you can see this is the final model that was created, to the right scale.

A 1:10 detail had to be made to show how the bridge would be made and held together; through research online we found a detail with all the components and from that I could start building a model.

Detail

As you can tell the bridge is made from, a 65x205mm clay paver, 20mm class 1 mortar, 60mm of dense basecourse bituminous macadam and 150mm compacted DTp1 Granular sub-base.

At the end of this day we were ready but still panicking as we had a model and poster to finish for Friday.

 

Humber Day 3 (Changes and model making)

 

After concluding, the day before that we would need to change our design to make it lighter and adapt more with the existing environment; we decided to remove the two smaller dome and make those landings, we kept the big donut one in the middle as that would be our “WOW” point of the bridge making it memorable for anyone who would use it. By removing the two smaller domes, this meant that we would be using ramp and not elevators.

We had to start looking at ramp requirements, to make sure our bridge met the restrictions but we did not want the ramp to be too steep for cyclists, due to market research we found that the desired steepness was 4%.

Most of day was spent considering how we could build a bridge that would meet the ramping restrictions which we found out that for every 10m a landing is needed.

The drawing above shows the development drawing, of the bridge once we decided to go for the ramps. We also had to look at the diameter of the donut we went for 8m radius, to accommodate, for both cyclists and pedestrians.

We went for arches supporting the donut shape as this would allow vehicles to pass through under as well as not take too much space on the path, as we are trying to cause the least amount of distribution when installing the bridge. The donut would need to be 5m off the ground, as this is the recommended height for bridges. We came up with covering the path with hardened glass, as it’s transparent and durable people would be able to appreciate the surroundings, and be protected from weathering and any accidents.

Later, in the day we started making the model of our bridge we decided to make our model 1:200 thinking it could work but little did we know we would be wrong……..

 

 

 

img_2290

The image above shows our 1:200 model.

 

Humber Day 2 (Precedent studies, inspiration and designing)

Day 2 of the bridge project, was all about getting our design finalized and materials together. So, that we could begin construction on the model on day 3.

Precedent studies:

Nature was a huge part of the design looking at the first ideas. Spiders and trees were some thoughts. I suggested a spider as we would have a middle part which would be donut shape and have different access points leaving it; just like a spider’s legs.  But the group decided to consider the tree idea but keep some aspects of the spider’s legs idea for the different access points; so, we ended up with a dreamy tree house bridge, with the brunches on the tree supporting the donut shape in the middle.

We began drawing up some ideas, as well as looking at some existing bridges for more inspiration and seeing how they were positioned and made, most importantly the materials that we used in creating the bridge.

Some of the bridges we looked at were the Ponte Segunda Circular, Peace bridge in Luchtsingel, Melkwe bridge and the Laguna Garzon bridge. These bridges helped us in steering our design process.

Ponte Segunda Circular

P

The bridge was designed by Telmo Cruz of MXT studio this footbridge is in the second circular road in Lisbon. The footbridge caters for pedestrians and cyclists. The orange passage is constructed using steel.

Importantly the bridge was inspired by its surroundings of farm paths that found within the local landscape.

This was great as it showed us an example of a big bridge that was also able to compliment its existing landscape and that’s what our bridge needed to do as well as can have various assess points to reach more people.

 

Peace Bridge

Completed in 2012 and designed by architect Santiago. The peace bridge spans the bow river in Calgary connecting a residential community with the downtown area. Using a helical structure to partially enclose the bridge; a central bike lane with a pedestrian path can be found on the structure.

 

p

Melkwe Bridge

Found in Purmerend and designed by NEXT architects, separates pedestrians and cyclists on two levels. With an archway of step curves located on the lower deck, which splits to allow boats to travel through the Noordhollandsch Kanaal.

k

This is where we got the idea f the two different levels separating the cyclists and pedestrians, but we did not consider that this bridge is over water and therefore can be heavy compared to ours which will be located on land.

Laguna Bridge

Located in Garzon, Uruguay and was designed by Rafael Vinoly. It was designed in a circular shape to force drivers to slow down and allow pedestrian access along the one -way circular route.h

Looking at this bridge was helpful as we could see a very recently built bridge with a similar design that we wanted to follow. Though research found that the bridge was made from concrete, which allowed us to reconsider the type of materials we could use, since our bridge wasn’t for cars we had to look at lightweight alternatives.

These are some the drawings we came up with after looking at some president studies.

We also started looking that legal requirement for the space a bike and pedestrians need on a bridge this was 5m between them with segregation which we would have.

 

 

Development drawings Development drawings

Location  Development drawings

We also able to decide on a location for our bridge.

Through the day we started building up upon the idea, one of these was having two separate bridges within the bridge, so basically having two different levels one for cyclists and another for pedestrians, that could be accessed to using a lift or a ramp; we also came up with having three circular structures as part of the bridge. The main one being a donut, and the others being domes with elevators and ramps for access. On further development, we thought of having columns that would add cover to both the levels, but unfortunately we were advised that wouldn’t work as it would make the structure heavy and not adaptable to the current environment.

 

So were basically back to square one on the idea and had to go back to the drawing board. The team leader advised everyone to go away and try and come up different ideas or concepts that would be able to fit within the existing environment but didn’t stray too much from the ordinal idea we came up with.

Resources

Pedestrian Bridges and footbridges with amazing design by Elizabeth Stamp-http://www.architecturaldigest.com/gallery/worlds-best-pedestrian-bridges/all

Rafael Vinoly completes cicular bridge spanning a Uruguayan logoon by Jessica Mairs -http://www.dezeen.com/2016/01/19/laguna-garzon-bridge-circular-rafael-vinoly-uruguay-lagoon/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mwaka Musuumba Humber -Day 1(ideas, briefing and getting a flow of thing)

Bridges, cyclists and footpaths.

Those were the main points I got from the briefing that was delivered this morning.

A group site inspection was carried out in order for everyone to have a better understanding of what surrounds we were working with. On this visit I took plenty pictures, that way when it came to designing we wouldn’t have to venture out into the cold again.

Once back in the warmth, sitting in our group we decided to start sketching down some ideas.

Something Noel said to us while on site struck out to me and boom I had it.
I was inspired by a spider, with it’s 8 legs, being the difference access points for the cyclists and the pedestrians.

After making a rough sketch and pitching the idea to the rest of the group they were sold on it.

And like that the day was over, our leader set us homework on doing more research on types of bridge supports, materials etc. Just to further our understanding.