TV companies need to invest more in Relationship Marketing and the use of email Marketing could be the solution

Image result for Game of thrones advert

A question for readers.

How many of you feel that TV companies  are only concerned about profit?

Do HBO, Fox, Showtime and FX really try to create an emotional/intellectual connection?

You might feel that there is  some sort of personal involvement and current marketing seems to be aimed at enforcing, continuing and encouraging your loyalty to TV shows which is great…until the series ends.

A major example of  this is AMC that has released shows such as The Walking Dead, Breaking Bad and Mad Men. Two of those shows have now ended and AMC has not been able to capitalise on high viewership numbers for those programmes and integrate them into their recent and struggling TVshows  e.g. Humans and Preacher.

This means that networks gain the attention of millions to watch popular shows, but cannot retain viewers for less popular  or new releases?

Perhaps HBO, Netflix, Comedy Central and some others can “get away with it” because they are more prolific and have people’s attention.

Companies, and their brands need to encourage Consumer-relationship Marketing and build a constant long-term bond with viewers ; once a customer has been attracted for one show the hook-up should be maintained.

Image result for relationship marketing

As Bai et al.(2007) say “acquiring customers is more expensive than retaining them”.

As such there are 4 potential perks :

  1. Customers engaged through relationship marketing buy more frequently.
  2. Overall marketing costs are reduced as there is no need to attract people a second time.
  3. Consumers are less price sensitive both because they are emotionally committed – either with the shows they loved, the TV network or future releases.
  4. They refer to others via word of mouth or online.

Guo supports this by stating that the current Marketing trend is to:

  • Establish a connection
  • Maintain said connection
  • Enhance and solidify the connection

Figures further prove this with 16% of the Fortune 500 having a blog (Guo 2015).

The paper further states that consumers encourage this relationship  with 93% of consumers wanting networks to be present on social media and 85% wanting customer-company interatction.

Customers are now being considered as life-time value sales rather than a collection of individual sale opportunities that have have to be constantly renewed.

The question is how to create a loyal fan-base? The Internet and e-mail marketing can be the solution.

Recently, e-mail marketing has lost some of its importance. For example Dma statistics show that only 9% of marketers think that all e-mails are relevant, despite  95% of them also believe e-mails are an important platform.. Additionally, there is lack of strategy on how to analyse, test and gather info regarding the database of clients.This is also demonstrated with the 2016 average ROI of £30.01.

Let’s imagine that big brands such as HBO, Netflix and others – also including smaller, lesser known TV networks – set up a quick and simple e-mail marketing system.

The database must be up-to-date ; according to Hubspot e-mails degrade annually by 22.5% this can be due to new email addresses or the decision to opt out of future e-mails. However, database can be renewed with an opt-in email campaign.

Next, e-mail signups must be encouraged. Websites such as Hubspot, Econsultancy and DMA provide valuable insight into email marketing best practices and promotion.

A sign-up box (not a link) should be provided ; doing this Orbit Media increased sign-ups by over 1400%.

 

 

 

 

 

To increase sign-ups  numerous platforms could be offered e.g.Facebook, Youtube and Pinterest. Some networks already follow this strategy

There is now a ready to be engaged database of e-mails, not an easy feat considering 49% of consumers receive 1 to 10 brand e-mails.

Econsultancy states that people sign-up mostly for sales (61%) and discounts (59%) but much less for TV networks (unless its a sale of TV boxsets or product memorabilia).

To create interest the focus should be on content e.g. online contests, behind the scene information, announcements etc..

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q&A livestreams on Youtube, an online contest promotion and a link on an online store could all be within the email.

Imagine an interesting Netflix e-mail that has behind the scene footage, memorabilia sales, upcoming shows and livestream announcements ? It would be a great way to keep people engaged and wanting more.

The last step to encourage more signups would be WOM with users sharing content on social media and keeping customer interest.

To implement this, TV brands would have to invest some time and effort to reap the best benefits. But in the long run it would be a useful and important method to create customer loyalty both to the company and brand ; it would not be  TV show specific and enable promotion of  other content.

Furthermore, opt-in options regarding e-mail preferences and how often content is e-mailed could also be analysed.

The potential drawback could be that people are not interested in what the TV networks have to offer but rather focus only on the TV shows. Additionally since TV shows are a highly visual form of entertainment, and as a result video marketing is very successful, e-mail marketing might not be the best approach. But there is lacking evidence to prove this.

 

I look at and follow many different TV networks/shows and feel there is untapped potential from for this type of promotion.

P.s. Here is an additional interesting read

The Economist e-mail marketing – How it could be improved and and use data analysis and segmentation better

blog_v3

Image Courtesy of MailChimp

Being a Business Student at the University of Brighton i have often had to read articles or source information from one of the most authoritative newsagents in the world : The Economist.

The Economist is considered nowadays one of the best papers and one that nearly all business graduates should at least sift through monthly to keep themselves informed on the world both from a cultural and a political standpoint.

Image result for economist imagesThe Economist business model is quite interesting since it allows limited access to articles on the website. If i am not mistakes it totals to 1 a day.

Unfortunately that means 2 things for the company :

  1. Clients only read a few articles every time
  2. Clients are not retained and are not a source of major income

 

So how does a 61 million £ business encourage clients to visit the Economist articles and website?  By e-mail obviously.

E-mails are, despite what people might believe, still one of the major forms of ROI (Return on Investment) compared to other forms of Online Marketing as cited in the Journal of Business Research (Chadwick, 2012).

Now full disclosure i receive the Economist newsletter, rarely read it unfortunately (yes i know i’m a lazy human being), and i did provide my personal e-mail to receive the notifications. This is a significant element since it renders the brand stronger. Imagine if it was Spam…it’s reputation, built over years (centuries by now) would be severely damaged.

picture1picture2picture3picture4

The articles provided in the newsletter are recent and topical. They are also tastebites on what is available and possible to read on their website.

When i subscribed to the Economist e-mail i provided alot of data that could be used to target me and draw me in easily…Data such as age (22), sex (male), country of origin (Italy). Additional information such as job position and industry could have been inserted but since the “student” option is unavailable i haven’t given them better targeting data.

Despite that i am shown articles about Hillary, Stock investments, Unpaid Internships in the UK and Baggage loss one day, Southafrican Corruption and Hollande popularity the next. Only the Unpaid Internships and how the Uk government is trying to counter the firms exploitation of this loophole is “Theoretically” important and relevant to me.

Had they sent me articles on the Italian Referendum occuring on the 4th of December, articles about Theresa May and her Brexit Negotiations, articles about student working opportunities growing or anything of the sort i would be “theoretically” more involved and interested.

As such it seems that there is no “personalisation” to my e-mail reader experience.

Don’t get me wrong the Newsletter is following all the Industry standards highlighted in numerous studies such as the Chadwick (2012) one highlighted before.

It has images, hyperlinks, advertising and the brand logo present in the letter. It is also of moderate length ranging in the 2 and a half pages range (slightly above the 2.4 pages Industry standard). This is a good sign because it shows that the company is having the right ideas and is most probably ahead of the curve in comparison to other pubblications.

But it could be better…

Many E-mail marketing blogs and e-mail marketing websites such as MailChimp and Hubspot provide valuable tools and tips on how to better target to costumers such as pre-built segmentation or further targeting information tips and tricks.

My suggestion to the Economist, in my humble opinion, would be Twofold:

  • Target Customers better and according to their data

Use the data insight of e-mail readers (both subscribers and non-subscribers users) to better target readers and determine thanks to clickthrough rates what readers want.

  • Gather Further information on what customers want

Gather insight into what readers would like to read by providing “targeting options” which can be in the form of Account preferences, click-to-article statistics and focus group statistics (the last can be very expensive to set up).

Overall i am happy with the e-mails and will try my best to read them more often. I do like the Economist and hope they survive the printed media squeeze currently occuring both now and in the future. But to do so the company cannot afford to coast by based only on reputation alone and must take risks and embrace innovation.

But let’s admit to it you probably all fell asleep wilst reading this…

If you haven’t please feel free to leave a comment, give an insight or to tweet me at @Akeengancu