TV companies need to invest more in Relationship Marketing and the use of email Marketing could be the solution

Image result for Game of thrones advert

A question for readers.

How many of you feel that TV companies  are only concerned about profit?

Do HBO, Fox, Showtime and FX really try to create an emotional/intellectual connection?

You might feel that there is  some sort of personal involvement and current marketing seems to be aimed at enforcing, continuing and encouraging your loyalty to TV shows which is great…until the series ends.

A major example of  this is AMC that has released shows such as The Walking Dead, Breaking Bad and Mad Men. Two of those shows have now ended and AMC has not been able to capitalise on high viewership numbers for those programmes and integrate them into their recent and struggling TVshows  e.g. Humans and Preacher.

This means that networks gain the attention of millions to watch popular shows, but cannot retain viewers for less popular  or new releases?

Perhaps HBO, Netflix, Comedy Central and some others can “get away with it” because they are more prolific and have people’s attention.

Companies, and their brands need to encourage Consumer-relationship Marketing and build a constant long-term bond with viewers ; once a customer has been attracted for one show the hook-up should be maintained.

Image result for relationship marketing

As Bai et al.(2007) say “acquiring customers is more expensive than retaining them”.

As such there are 4 potential perks :

  1. Customers engaged through relationship marketing buy more frequently.
  2. Overall marketing costs are reduced as there is no need to attract people a second time.
  3. Consumers are less price sensitive both because they are emotionally committed – either with the shows they loved, the TV network or future releases.
  4. They refer to others via word of mouth or online.

Guo supports this by stating that the current Marketing trend is to:

  • Establish a connection
  • Maintain said connection
  • Enhance and solidify the connection

Figures further prove this with 16% of the Fortune 500 having a blog (Guo 2015).

The paper further states that consumers encourage this relationship  with 93% of consumers wanting networks to be present on social media and 85% wanting customer-company interatction.

Customers are now being considered as life-time value sales rather than a collection of individual sale opportunities that have have to be constantly renewed.

The question is how to create a loyal fan-base? The Internet and e-mail marketing can be the solution.

Recently, e-mail marketing has lost some of its importance. For example Dma statistics show that only 9% of marketers think that all e-mails are relevant, despite  95% of them also believe e-mails are an important platform.. Additionally, there is lack of strategy on how to analyse, test and gather info regarding the database of clients.This is also demonstrated with the 2016 average ROI of £30.01.

Let’s imagine that big brands such as HBO, Netflix and others – also including smaller, lesser known TV networks – set up a quick and simple e-mail marketing system.

The database must be up-to-date ; according to Hubspot e-mails degrade annually by 22.5% this can be due to new email addresses or the decision to opt out of future e-mails. However, database can be renewed with an opt-in email campaign.

Next, e-mail signups must be encouraged. Websites such as Hubspot, Econsultancy and DMA provide valuable insight into email marketing best practices and promotion.

A sign-up box (not a link) should be provided ; doing this Orbit Media increased sign-ups by over 1400%.

 

 

 

 

 

To increase sign-ups  numerous platforms could be offered e.g.Facebook, Youtube and Pinterest. Some networks already follow this strategy

There is now a ready to be engaged database of e-mails, not an easy feat considering 49% of consumers receive 1 to 10 brand e-mails.

Econsultancy states that people sign-up mostly for sales (61%) and discounts (59%) but much less for TV networks (unless its a sale of TV boxsets or product memorabilia).

To create interest the focus should be on content e.g. online contests, behind the scene information, announcements etc..

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q&A livestreams on Youtube, an online contest promotion and a link on an online store could all be within the email.

Imagine an interesting Netflix e-mail that has behind the scene footage, memorabilia sales, upcoming shows and livestream announcements ? It would be a great way to keep people engaged and wanting more.

The last step to encourage more signups would be WOM with users sharing content on social media and keeping customer interest.

To implement this, TV brands would have to invest some time and effort to reap the best benefits. But in the long run it would be a useful and important method to create customer loyalty both to the company and brand ; it would not be  TV show specific and enable promotion of  other content.

Furthermore, opt-in options regarding e-mail preferences and how often content is e-mailed could also be analysed.

The potential drawback could be that people are not interested in what the TV networks have to offer but rather focus only on the TV shows. Additionally since TV shows are a highly visual form of entertainment, and as a result video marketing is very successful, e-mail marketing might not be the best approach. But there is lacking evidence to prove this.

 

I look at and follow many different TV networks/shows and feel there is untapped potential from for this type of promotion.

P.s. Here is an additional interesting read

Film and Tv show companies have got social media wrong: How can they really attract, engage and maintain consumers while also bringing on board new users?

Often, when looking at Social Media and its promotional content  I see ads from some of my favourite Movie or TV show producers and find myself wondering if that was the best way to promote it.

To be honest often times i do not think so.

Clearly this is the reflection of a University student but I do think that many Media companies have the wrong approach.

 

As Hoffman and Fodor (2010) point out in the MIT Sloan Management Review, there has to be a re-imagining of the relationship with the consumer compared to traditional media marketing.

If Social-Media Marketing were the same as traditional media then ROI (return-on-investment) for every dollar would be easily accountable and every view, sale, like and favourite would be easily quantifiable and predictable.

However, that is not the case since Social Media is significantly different to previous mediums. As Hanna et al.(2011) point out consumers are not passive recipients anymore and Social Media is highly interactive, pro-active and discussion-oriented.

Instead what Social Media should be doing – according to both Hoffman and Fodor (2010) and Hanna et al.(2011) – is focus on specific objectives and then aim from there to create so called “Consumer Investment/Interaction”.

 

Liking a photo and moving on doesn’t imply that the user will remember your advert since he is bombarded CONSTANTLY by just as many marketers trying to grab his attention.

However, if a user becomes aware and engaged by the Media content and constantly comes back for more, then you have now gained a loyal customer who will in some form or other communicate positively on-line (but especially off-line) to friends and family about your Brand.

This so called bottom-up Marketing, mentioned by Hanna et al.(2011), is important to note since it allows Marketers to tread into the very personal and private space of people’s relationships with others. We trust our friends and their opinions, and if a friend suggests some amazing new film or TV show and you value their opinion, you will be more inclined to want to watch it and look out for it.

 

I believe the ROI focused mentality exists because of attachment that we have to old media and the relative ease of associating simple actions/promotions to create interest.

“Relative” ease means that there is no serious consideration  of consumers. Hoffman and Fodor (2011) state that Social Media should be part of a fully integrated Marketing campaign and not just tacked on to other promotions.

But there is a significant difference between good quality and engaging promotions as opposed to a simple (and in my opinion uninteresting Marketing Campaign) that has very few aims and is just copy and pasted on all Social Media platforms. As the examples below:

 

INSERT IMAGES

 

Venture Harbour (2014), a digital Marketing Agency provides in one of their blog posts many tips that can be used to promote and create buzz around a TV show or film and provide many interesting examples. As shown below, together with some others chosen by yours truly. They are still promotional but with entertainment content and a lot more engaging, interesting and overall stand out from the rest of the pack.

The provided examples which are shown below, together with some others chosen by yours truly, are still promotional  entertainment content but they are alot more engaging, interesting and overall stand out from the rest of the pack.

 

INSERT IMAGES

 

The content involves and interacts with the consumer in various ways and forms, be it in the form of user submitted Fan-art, competitions that actively engage viewers, sales or even humour.

 

Obviously, there has to be a decision behind the Marketing Plan which must be tailored to the audience (Age, Sex, Country), to the brand’s image (making comedy for a serious TV series is a bit out of place), but also to the objectives that have been established.

Looking at The Hollywood Reporters and BrandWatch best marketing campaigns from last year, there is a significant trend:

 

Difference from the rest

More memorable from the rest

Tailored approach based on what is being promoted

 

So if you get the chance to promote a TV show or Movie, and you want it to succeed, take a bit of time in thinking out the best and most productive way to promote – not just the easiest and laziest way.

 

HBO – Digital marketing company audit

Image result for HBO logo

Who is HBO?

Hbo, the world renown multi-prize winning cable and satellite network company owned by Time Warner, is one of the most popular and successful companies in the Tv and Film industry. In 2014 alone the revenue was 4.6 Billion dollars and viewers were 92 Million according to Sam Mattera. Despite being one of the most respected and best TV producers and Cable networks it cannot sit on its laurels since many innovations, competitors and industry changes are threatening the companies future.

As a result they must have a Digital marketing plan which ensures promoting their original programming that involves popular shows such as Game of Thrones, The Wire and the newly released Westworld alongside their cable network, their streaming app HBO GO and/or, in case it is not available in a country, their previously mentioned original shows on other platforms.

Image result for hbo shows

Currently the firms main strength lies in its multiple Prize winning shows and the brand association that comes with it, that being: Quality TV produced by capable TV show producers.

As a result its “library” is very diversified and aimed at all age ranges. But the companies hegemony and influence has been under threat in recent years.

The TV industry is changing

Currently the TV industry is witnessing a significant trend towards cord-cutting (the process of avoiding cable connections and services) in exchange for the more popular online SVOD (Subscription video on demand) Services such as Netflix and Amazon Video.

The developing trend of cord-cutting, according to Baccarne et al., is due both to the de-regulation and liberalization of broadcasting distribution alongside the opportunities created by the digitization and innovative business models available thanks to the Internet. Consequently, firms such as Youtube and Netflix have taken advantage of this gap and entered this market. Alongside these new entrants Tv producers are also experiencing a significant increase in illegal distribution of their content on peer-to-peer websites such as Putlocker. As a result of this wide array of accessing options, many users , according to the previously mentioned Digiworld academic journal,are constantly searching for the best “value for money” option.

The industry as a whole have been slow to react to these new business opportunities that allow them to, now more than ever, to distribute their content outside the US or embrace new business practices. HBO is trying to avoid this by being involved in the digital distribution era and trying to contrast in the US Netflix and similar platforms by offering its own fast growing streaming platform HBO GO and internationally by offering and promoting (via Press releases, Seo optimization and media alerting) the availability of its shows on partnered platforms.

The Marketing

Currently HBO’s Digital Marketing execution seems comparatively different compared to other competitors, especially in the Online SVOD industry.

Netflix and Amazon Video for example are more “Community focused” and try to have people interact with their content.

amazon-capture capture capture3 capture4

Hbo on the other hand seems to have a more “corporate” approach with mainly announcements being their focus.

capturehbo1

On the other hand they promote the availability of their content on available platforms multiple times and ways.

capturehbo2 cross-promotion

But whilst the promotion of their shows on other platforms is positive it ignores one of Kaplans 4 I’s that being “Involvement” in which there is an attempt to engage the consumer and start a conversation. This can also be seen on the on the opt-in e-mail marketing side of things too as shown below.

capture

The E-mail is old looking, not Mobile friendly and links to a now deleted Myspace page, a social media that by todays standards is basically dead. Compared to the basic industry standards that studies such as the popular Chadwick et al. study point out it seems to be sorely lacking in many elements such as Page lenght, number of Hyperlinks and images. This just shows that they are not considering the potential of promoting themselves, HBO GO or even their online store.

This seems so different to their previous modus operandi when in 2003 it won “best e-mail campaign” thanks to a highly targeted e-mail campaign as highlighted by Marketing Sherpa.

Email marketing could still be very useful since it can provide powerful imagery to grab attention, provide and incentivise viewer consumption and the promotion of the brand image itself. Below is a very good example provided by Campaign Monitor

showtime

A valid criticism one could make is that Hbo does not want to focus on e-mail marketing and wants to focus more on Online Partnerships and Social Media. On the other hand people can point out the statistics that show the still underlying profitability E-mail marketing brings. An example is the statistic provided by Campaign Monitor that claims that the ROI (Return on Investment) for every 1$ spent is 38$ earned.

As such HBO could promote DVD sales, new broadcasting availability and its online shop via a revitalised and repurposed e-mail marketing. Other sectors that need re-vitalizing are the interactive ad channel and the ability to quickly and promptly find their value on various platforms.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Economist e-mail marketing – How it could be improved and and use data analysis and segmentation better

blog_v3

Image Courtesy of MailChimp

Being a Business Student at the University of Brighton i have often had to read articles or source information from one of the most authoritative newsagents in the world : The Economist.

The Economist is considered nowadays one of the best papers and one that nearly all business graduates should at least sift through monthly to keep themselves informed on the world both from a cultural and a political standpoint.

Image result for economist imagesThe Economist business model is quite interesting since it allows limited access to articles on the website. If i am not mistakes it totals to 1 a day.

Unfortunately that means 2 things for the company :

  1. Clients only read a few articles every time
  2. Clients are not retained and are not a source of major income

 

So how does a 61 million £ business encourage clients to visit the Economist articles and website?  By e-mail obviously.

E-mails are, despite what people might believe, still one of the major forms of ROI (Return on Investment) compared to other forms of Online Marketing as cited in the Journal of Business Research (Chadwick, 2012).

Now full disclosure i receive the Economist newsletter, rarely read it unfortunately (yes i know i’m a lazy human being), and i did provide my personal e-mail to receive the notifications. This is a significant element since it renders the brand stronger. Imagine if it was Spam…it’s reputation, built over years (centuries by now) would be severely damaged.

picture1picture2picture3picture4

The articles provided in the newsletter are recent and topical. They are also tastebites on what is available and possible to read on their website.

When i subscribed to the Economist e-mail i provided alot of data that could be used to target me and draw me in easily…Data such as age (22), sex (male), country of origin (Italy). Additional information such as job position and industry could have been inserted but since the “student” option is unavailable i haven’t given them better targeting data.

Despite that i am shown articles about Hillary, Stock investments, Unpaid Internships in the UK and Baggage loss one day, Southafrican Corruption and Hollande popularity the next. Only the Unpaid Internships and how the Uk government is trying to counter the firms exploitation of this loophole is “Theoretically” important and relevant to me.

Had they sent me articles on the Italian Referendum occuring on the 4th of December, articles about Theresa May and her Brexit Negotiations, articles about student working opportunities growing or anything of the sort i would be “theoretically” more involved and interested.

As such it seems that there is no “personalisation” to my e-mail reader experience.

Don’t get me wrong the Newsletter is following all the Industry standards highlighted in numerous studies such as the Chadwick (2012) one highlighted before.

It has images, hyperlinks, advertising and the brand logo present in the letter. It is also of moderate length ranging in the 2 and a half pages range (slightly above the 2.4 pages Industry standard). This is a good sign because it shows that the company is having the right ideas and is most probably ahead of the curve in comparison to other pubblications.

But it could be better…

Many E-mail marketing blogs and e-mail marketing websites such as MailChimp and Hubspot provide valuable tools and tips on how to better target to costumers such as pre-built segmentation or further targeting information tips and tricks.

My suggestion to the Economist, in my humble opinion, would be Twofold:

  • Target Customers better and according to their data

Use the data insight of e-mail readers (both subscribers and non-subscribers users) to better target readers and determine thanks to clickthrough rates what readers want.

  • Gather Further information on what customers want

Gather insight into what readers would like to read by providing “targeting options” which can be in the form of Account preferences, click-to-article statistics and focus group statistics (the last can be very expensive to set up).

Overall i am happy with the e-mails and will try my best to read them more often. I do like the Economist and hope they survive the printed media squeeze currently occuring both now and in the future. But to do so the company cannot afford to coast by based only on reputation alone and must take risks and embrace innovation.

But let’s admit to it you probably all fell asleep wilst reading this…

If you haven’t please feel free to leave a comment, give an insight or to tweet me at @Akeengancu