Aside from observing a couple of teachers during a short induction that I had for my first teaching job, my experience of peer observations has been whilst doing my TESOL and then at the school I am  teaching at now. Considering I have been working at the school for almost two years, I have only observed 2 lessons and been observed by 1 peer (aside from the observations from my DOS). I hadn’t really thought about this until now, but that doesn’t seem all that many if the advantages of peer observations are correct in terms of the benefits to individual teachers, the learners, and therefore the school as a whole. 

I look forward to and enjoy watching peers. However, I think in my current teaching context  I’ve seen it more in terms of developing my own practice rather than supporting my peers to develop theirs. I feel during my TESOL I had a different approach. I saw it as having a second set of eyes on what was happening in the classroom and seeing what it was like to be a learner for that lesson. It’s interesting that this is not how I have felt in my current teaching role. Maybe this is because I felt on a ‘level playing field’ during my TESOL. We were all just starting out and all feeling very nervous. We’d had so many classes together as learners ourselves and then trying things out on each other in a teaching role, I felt that I could not only offer support and encouragement, but be honest about what I thought worked well and areas that I felt hadn’t gone so well. We’d spend time discussing this. The school I am at now has some very supportive teachers, but I am aware that they have so much more experience than I do. My peer observations were set up to give me an opportunity to watch teachers who are experienced in teaching Swedes, especially at a Folk high school. So when I observed them I saw it as a learning opportunity for me, but also because I don’t think I was quite sure what I should be feeding back to them about.

I get extremely nervous about being watched. I feel nauseas and panicked and want the whole experience to end as soon as possible. I plan the lesson in far more detail than I normally would but feel this distracts from a  more free flowing lesson. The reason I plan it in more detail is probably to feel more in control, which then has a more negative impact on my teaching. 

I think that if peer observations are carried out using certain models or structures, they can be hugely beneficial. For example, the diagram adapted from ‘Classroom Observation’ by Matt O’Leary (2014) shows a model of how peer observations can work. 

This is what has been missing so far in the peer observations I have been involved in. Having an agreed focus would make it easier to know what to look out for during a lesson and feedback would be far more meaningful and beneficial for the person being observed. Actions should be made from this and applied to the observed persons teaching so that things move forward. 

There are benefits for both the observee and the observer. The teacher being observed has an opportunity to try out new strategies, develop different approaches to managing a problem they are having, to boost confidence and to encourage reflection on teaching and learning. The observer has the opportunity to view the lesson from a learners perspective and may pick up some helpful tips or strategies that can help with their own teaching. This in turn feeds into benefits for the school as a whole. According to John Hattie (Hatti, Masters and Birch, 2015; cited in Cambridge Assessment international education) a shared approach to professional development improves teacher effectiveness. Therefore, having the opportunity to learn from each other can stimulate new ideas and improve teaching practice. This doesn’t mean that teachers copy other teachers’ styles, what it does is open up opportunities for a teacher to reflect on their own practice and adapt another teachers techniques to suit their own style of teaching. As stated by William, 2016; cited in Cambridge Assessment International Education, “….the ability of teachers to modify the techniques to make them work in their own classrooms is an important feature of any effective model of teacher development”. This is an area that I feel I have had the opportunity to do with the peer observations I have been involved in, and one that I have used. 

In the current context, video recording seems the best way to engage in peer observations. It is going to be interesting using a video to record a lesson, or part of a lesson and then have my course peers watch it back. I’m not sure if I will feel less pressured by not having an observer in the classroom or if the process of watching the video back whilst with my peers will cause me more anxiety. Time will tell.

SETT

As part of a reflective process when observing peers, Nancy introduced us to SETT, and suggested it may be a useful tool for us to use. SETT stands for self-evaluation of teacher talk. This framework was devised by Steve Walsh and is discussed in his paper Talking the Talk (ELT Journal Volume 60/2 April 2006). It was largely influenced by social cultural theories of learning. The paper considers ways in which ‘a detailed understanding of classroom discourse can be achieved through the use of reflective practices and professional dialogue’ (Walsh 2006). It is important for the teacher to be able to understand classroom communication and make tactical decisions in the moment as a lesson develops to be able to develop second language acquisition within the classroom.

The SETT framework allows teachers to look at classroom interaction and how, through a range of modes (McCarthy and Walsh 2003), teaching and learning take place. According to Walsh, the classroom is made up of a series of modes (sometimes referred to micro contexts) which are created through interaction to give space for learning. Teachers are often concerned about the amount of teacher talk time (TTT) that occurs within the classroom, it’s often an area that I am very conscious of and came up on numerous occasions during working towards obtaining the Cert TESOL. However, Walsh states that it isn’t so much about the amount of time teachers talk, it is more to do with the place it has and what it’s doing.  He advocates that watching a snap shot of our teaching, even a video recording of 3 to 5 minutes, can raise awareness and highlight certain features in our teaching. It can help teachers to build up a profile of what we are like as a teacher and we can then work on particular aspects. By watching a video of yourself teaching using SETT, teachers are able to analyse their own classroom data and can then go on to use this information to facilitate participation in reflective feedback interviews with other teachers.

The focus of SETT is on the pedagogy goal of that moment rather than the lesson overall. For example, a focus on eliciting or giving a set of instructions. The SETT framework is made up of a series of 4 classroom modes and thirteen interactional features. A mode has specific interactional features and specific pedagogy goals, of which Walsh has identified four:

Skills and systems mode – focus on language, grammar, vocabulary or pronunciation

Managerial mode – main focus on setting up or finishing an activity

Classroom context mode – eliciting feeling and attitudes, trying to get personal experiences. Often used at the beginning of a lesson to set the context of the lesson

Materials mode –  main focus on using text or other types of materials

The thirteen interactional features are as follows:

Feature of Teacher Talk Description
  1. Scaffolding
  1. Reformulation (rephrasing a student’s contribution)
  2. Extension (extending a student’s contribution)
  3. Modelling (providing an example for students)
  1. Direct Repair
Correcting an error quickly and directly
  1. Form-focused feedback 
Giving feedback on the language used, not the message.
  1. Content feedback
Giving feedback on the message rather than the language used
  1. Extended teacher turn
Teacher turn of more than one utterance.
  1. Extended Student Turn
Student turn of more than one utterance.
  1. Extended wait-time
Allowing sufficient time (several seconds) for students to respond or formulate a response.
  1. Teacher Echo
  1. Teacher repeats teacher’s previous utterance
  2. Teacher repeats a student’s contribution. 
  1. Teacher Interruptions
Interrupting a student’s contribution. 
  1. Turn Completion
Teacher completing a student’s contribution for them.
  1. Seeking clarification
  1. Teacher asks a student to clarify something the student said.
  2. Student asks teacher to clarify something the teacher has said.
  1. Display Questions
Teacher asks questions they know the answer to.
  1. Referential Questions
Genuine questions to which the teacher doesn’t know the answer

As a group, we decided to use it for our second round of peer observations. We chose  a 10-15 minute video clip of our own teaching. We watched it and decided which modes were in operation. We then watched the clip a second time  and used the template to record instances and examples of teacher talk. As a group of three, we bought our clips to a session on Teams to watch through together and evaluate our teacher talk. My evaluations of Sians and Anna’s lessons using SETT can be found in the Observing my peers section of my blog. The evaluation of my lesson can be found in the Peer observed lessons section of my blog.

References

Walsh, S. 2006. Talking the talk of the TESOL classroom. ELT Journal Volume 60, 2 April 2006; Published by Oxford University Press.